RSS

Category Archives: Materiality and Virtuality: A Conference on Comics

Comics Forum Online: Year One Review and Comics Forum 2012 Call for Papers

One year ago today, comicsforum.org launched with this introductory post. Today I’m pleased to present a look back at the past year of articles by major comics scholars from around the world, and a look ahead to what’s coming next for Comics Forum, including our annual conference.

Comics Forum 2012: Call for Papers

First up, I’m delighted to release the call for papers for Comics Forum 2012, which as usual will be taking place in Leeds (UK) as part of the Thought Bubble sequential art festival this November.

Click here for a PDF version of this CFP.

This is the fourth Comics Forum conference, and it promises to be another very engaging event, with scholars and creators coming together to establish dialogues and fruitful collaborations. We’re working on lining up some wonderful keynote speakers, and will have more news on that and other developments on the brand new Comics Forum 2012 page in coming months. To keep up with all the latest developments, keep checking the homepage, or subscribe by email or RSS to be informed whenever we post new content (you can subscribe using the form in the column on the right hand side of this page).

The call for papers was designed by Ben Gaskell of Molakoe Graphic Design, and as always he’s done a great job. Many thanks to Ben for his hard work on this.

Comics Forum Online: Year One

Comics Forum’s first year online has seen a wide range of subjects being addressed in posts by a mix of established scholars and new up and comers. Our first guest post came from Clark Burscough of Thought Bubble, who gave an insight into the convention’s history and the thriving community of comics creators and fans that have helped it become one of the UK’s top annual comics events in just a few years. Thought Bubble 2012 looks set to be the biggest year yet, with a great line-up of guests; well worth a visit!

Fans and the sociological and community aspects of comics also provided the focus for articles later in the year, with Dan Berry pulling out some of the major themes to emerge from his interviews with over 40 comics industry figures, Benjamin Woo discussing the possibilities for mapping the spaces of comics, and Simon Locke and Casey Brienza engaging in a spirited debate around the complexities of establishing a sociological understanding of the comics field.

The study of comics also came in for some scrutiny, with Ernesto Priego and Randy Duncan & Matthew J. Smith considering how the burgeoning field of Comics Studies can continue to grow. More personal accounts of the growth of comics scholarship came from David Huxley and Rob Weiner, and Chris Murray talked about setting up the first MLitt course on Comics Studies in the UK. Sarah Lightman discussed the Women in Comics intiative, Paul Register outlined the genesis of the UK’s Stan Lee Excelsior Award for graphic novels, and Corinne Pearlman provided a brief history of Sussex cartoonists organisation Cartoon County. We also had reviews of July’s major international conference on comics in Manchester from Joan Ormrod, Julia Round and Matthew Screech, and a review of Comics Forum 2011 from John Swogger. Tony Venezia wrote on the annual Transitions conference and discussed the ‘indisciplined middle space’ that comics occupy. We also heard about comics scholarship internationally, with Daniel Stein and Lida Tsene discussing the situations in Germany and Greece respectively.

French language comics were discussed in a number of articles. Ann Miller presented a fascinating overview of the troubles being experienced by eminent French publisher L’Association, and Mark McKinney considered the colonial heritage of comics in French. Catriona MacLeod outlined the history of the ‘forgotten French feminist comics magazine’ Ah! Nana, and we also heard from noted comics herstorian and contributor to Ah! Nana, Trina Robbins.

Other issues considered on the blog included the various ways in which we can think about comics. Aaron Meskin presented an overview of philosophical approaches, while Hannah Wadle and José Alaniz looked at the applications of comics in the field of anthropology. Laurike in ‘t Veld wrote on genocide in comics. Rikke Platz Cortsen discussed the presentation of hospitals and illness, themes also taken up (amongst others) by Ian Williams, Maria Vaccarella and MK Czerwiec in our Graphic Medicine column. Karrie Fransman also addressed issues of representation of the body in a two part video on her graphic novel The House That Groaned.

The overlaps between comics and other media were the subjects for posts from LJ Maher, who wrote on comics and transmedia narratives, Joe Sutliff Sanders, who discussed allusion in comics, and Zara Dinnen, who considered the presence of comics in the works of ‘two Jonathans’: Jonathan Letham and Jonathan Franzen. Kirstie Gregory and Paul Atkinson looked at the relationships between sculpture and comic art in our second regular column. Daniel Merlin Goodbrey considered possible future directions for comics. The deconstruction of Superman undertaken by Steven T. Seagle in It’s a bird… was the subject of an article by Esther Claudio Moreno, while Charles Forceville looked at the visualization of anger in comics. Greice Schneider discussed the role of boredom in the production of comics, a theme she has also picked up on in our latest ongoing column, Image [&] Narrative, in association with the online journal of the same name. Greice’s co-writers on the column are Charlotte Pylyser and Steven Surdiacourt.

We also launched a number of online resources for comics scholars in year one. Our affiliated conferences section set up with a number of downloadable documents and audio files from the Comics & Conflicts conference at the Imperial War Museum last August. Next week we’ll be launching our second affiliated conferences page, providing downloadable content from last year’s conference ‘Comics & Medicine: The Sequential Art of Illness’ in Chicago. If you are a conference organiser and would like your event to be included in our affiliated conferences section, drop us an email at comicsforum@hotmail.co.uk so we can set it up. Our digital texts section provides free downloads of academic works on comics. Already in place are texts by Ian Gordon and Daniel Raeburn, and we will be looking to expand our selection over the next year. Finally, our scholar directory offers all comics scholars the opportunity to get listed, and to find out who’s researching what. If you’re not already listed in the directory, you can download a data form here to be added.

Coming soon

Over the next year we’ll be looking to expand our current offerings and add more resources, as well as continuing to provide a varied lineup of guest authors and news updates from around the scholarly community. Coming up in September we have a special themed month of articles on the short works of Alan Moore, and there’s still time to get your proposals in if you want to write something for that; the call for papers is available here. We’re also planning to continue our lecture series, which launched with a great talk on comics and philosophy by Aaron Meskin and Roy Cook at the Henry Moore Institute in Leeds this March. In addition to Comics Forum 2012, we’ll also be running a table at this year’s Thought Bubble convention so whether you’re an established scholar or you’re interested in getting started studying comics and don’t know where to begin, come and say hello!

A huge thank you to all our readers and authors over the past year; your comments and encouragement are much appreciated, and it is only thanks to your support that comicsforum.org has been able to get off to such a strong start. Here’s to another great year!

Ian Hague, Director of Comics Forum

 

Digital Comics: New Mutations & Innovations by Daniel Merlin Goodbrey

We are pleased to be able to offer Daniel Merlin Goodbrey’s presentation ‘Digital Comics: New Mutations & Innovations’ for download in PDF format. This paper was presented on the 18th of November 2011 as part of Comics Forum 2011. Many thanks to Daniel for making this available!

Click here to download the presentation.

Abstract: The medium of comics sits on the cusp of the digital future promised to comic creators at the turn of the century. Explorations of the infinite canvas and the many strange mutations of the hypercomic have been given a new relevance and audience by the recent advances in portable display and mobile media. Now, with a decade of experimental digital work behind us, the wider world is at last beginning to catch up to these odd outliers of the form.

As the comics industry moves to catch up with the frontier, newer and stranger ideas must be entertained. The hunt for weirder, more wonderful mutations must be renewed with new vigour and new purpose. This talk considers the different directions potential explorers of the medium might next pursue. It examines the possibilities of new forms such as locative, sonic, game, spatial and AR comics. In doing so it aims to map some of the many trails leading out into the new decade of experimental comics that lies before us.

Daniel Merlin Goodbrey is a senior lecturer in Interaction Design at The University of Hertfordshire in England. A prolific and innovative comic creator, Goodbrey has gained international recognition as a leading expert in the field of experimental digital comics. His hypercomic work received the International Clickburg Webcomic Award in Holland in 2006 while his work in print was awarded with the Isotope Award for Excellence In Comics in San Francisco in 2005. An archive of his work can be found here.

Comics Forum 2011 was supported by Thought Bubble, the University of Chichester, the Henry Moore Institute, Dr Mel Gibson, Routledge, Arts Council England, Intellect and Molakoe Graphic Design.

 

Comics Forum 2011 by John G. Swogger

Surely writing a review of a comics conference is on par with dancing about architecture? Text seems such an impoverished medium now – unequipped to condense three days into anything like a reasonable representation of the event. As unaccompanied text, “diverse”, “exciting” and “passionate” sound somewhat fatuous – the reviewer’s equivalent of multiple exclamation marks or a string of emoticons. A series of comic-panel vignettes really would be so much better.

If I did this review as a comic, “diverse” would be replaced with pages showing the work of artists like Karrie Fransman, Elodie Durand and Ian Kirkpatrick. In a comic, “exciting” would be replaced by quick-cut series of panels of Daniel Merlin Goodbrey flicking through a stream of digital-format comics, each one more inventive than the last. In a comic, “passionate” would be replaced with speech-bubbles from the intense, disquieting, sometimes overwhelmingly honest talks by Andrew Godfrey, Paula Knight and Katie Green.

In a comic, I could draw us attendees not just sitting in the two conference halls, but also gathering together in small, intense conversations in the pubs afterwards. I could show all of us hurriedly scribbling ideas away on the backs of our conference folders. I could show us flipping the pages of our programmes back and forth, trying to decide which of the conflicting sessions to attend – and then trying to sneak between the A room and the B room to catch as much of each set of speakers as we could.

In a comic, I could show how Comics Forum was a place not just for those who read comics – not even just for those who write comics, but for those who collect, study and archive comics; for those who know where comics have been, and those who are deciding where comics are going. For those who are making comics – literally – as if their lives depended on it, and those who are making sure that the rest of the world knows how important those comics really are. And perhaps, most importantly, in a comic I could have a big panel (running across two pages, probably) showing all these different people – the academics, the curators, the collectors, the writers, the illustrators – talking to each other, exchanging ideas, coming up with new ways of working together, new ways of studying, collecting, curating, writing and illustrating comics.

In a comic, I could then devote another double-page spread to Thought Bubble, and show all those people from the conference – all the academics, the collectors, the writers and the illustrators – rubbing shoulders with comics fans, heroes and cosplayers. That double-page spread would look fantastic: Bryan Talbot and Adam Hughes, Nicola Streeten and the launch of Nelson, all those roller-derby girls, the wonky Wookies and the slightly-overweight Stormtroopers, Judge Dredd and his hobnobs, the steampunk captain and his teapot; small press, medium press, no press; teeshirts, badges, CDs, DVDs; graphic novels, newspapers and hand-bound ‘zines; two halls filled with everything that’s great about comics.

At this point in my comic I’d probably step in as a character myself – do that fourth wall thing and talk about my favourite bits about Comics Forum. I’d talk about how there was something particularly exciting about being involved in a conference like Comics Forum where people are still passionate about what they write and draw and why they do it. At most conferences you know exactly what you’re going to get – and most speakers, chairs and questioners say exactly what you expect them to say. Not at Comics Forum: the best thing about it was probably that you didn’t know what was coming next. Arguments? Shouting matches? You want that at a conference – you want people to be taking this stuff seriously. You want to know you’re surrounded by people who have a real sense of commitment to the medium – who shout and argue because they’re passionate about it, because they – well, because they believe in it, I guess.

If I was writing this review as a comic, I could show all that. I could show you just how diverse, how exciting, how passionate it was. I could show you how much I enjoyed it, how much I want to come back next year, how I want it to be longer, so I can talk to everyone and go to all the sessions.

Yeah. If I was writing this review as a comic, that’s what I’d do – I’d show you all that stuff. But I suppose you’ll just have to take my word for it. Or go to Comics Forum 2012 and see for yourself.

John Swogger is an archaeological illustrator and co-author of the comic book “Something Different About Dad”, about living with a parent with Asperger Syndrome. He is currently writing a comic book memoir about his experiences working as an archaeologist on stone age sites in Turkey.

 

Anthropology goes Comics by Hannah Wadle

While film and photography have fallen on fertile ground from the early days of Anthropology and moulded the sub-discipline of Visual Anthropology, comics has not yet become an equally respected and applied ethnographic methodological tool and format of presenting anthropological knowledge. There are a few individual artists-anthropologists, who contribute to a discussion on comics and anthropology, but thousands of anthropologists returning from fieldwork, with their numerous little diaries, filled not only with written notes, but also with sketches and drawings, leave their graphic work behind and begin with their “real work”, the writing, as soon as they are back in their home universities.

So I got quite excited when I opened the reading file for my postgraduate research seminar (Social Anthropology Department, University of Manchester) on commercial and non-commercial sexual encounters between gay men in The Village in Manchester and found myself looking straight into the eyes of an informant from Michael Atkins’ PhD project, or rather a powerfully pencilled representation of him, drawn by Atkins himself.

Image from ‘The Dark Side of the Village’ courtesy of Michael Atkins.

On nine pages the anthropologist told me an ethnographic tale about the “Dark side of The Village”, in which he visualised and narrated the role of the gaze for sexual encounters in public areas of The Village – performances that are invisible in public discourses and for those who do not engage in them. Into photographs of empty settings in The Village he had inserted drawn acting characters, created as fragmental and anonymised aliases of his informants.

[Click here to read Michael Atkins' nine-page comic. Reader discretion is advised; comic includes a small amount of sexual content.]

Methodologies: Communicating through drawing

Sally Gallman (2009), who conducted a study of trainee teachers’ identities by drawing what she calls a graphic novella with her participants, emphasises the processes and intimate nature of drawing. She found that by letting young teachers-to-be draw what they imagined about their private and professional futures, she could evoke emotions and worldviews that would have remained unexpressed in oral narrations.

Whereas in her case the intimacy of the creative process sometimes caused her problems as teachers feared to fail in the performance of drawing, for Camilla Morelli (2011) drawing turned out to be the first language of contact with the Matses children in the Peruvian Amazon, the main informants for her PhD study: Morelli, who was at first not able to communicate with the monolingual children in their mother tongue Matses, gained an insight into the daily life, perceptions, dreams and fears of the children by engaging with them in common sessions of drawing, during which she also started to learn Matses.

Artist and Anthropologist Manuel Joao Ramos often experienced what Gallman and Morelli also described as beneficial for their research: Carrying his sketchbook around on travels and on fieldwork and making use of it by drawing openly, he evoked communicative moments with his environment. He emphasises the open character of making drawings and sequential graphic narratives and sets it in contrast to photographing or videoing:

It generally strikes me that, whereas taking photographs or using a video camera frequently creates a barrier between me and the people I work with, when drawing I become the subject of a more benign form of curiosity, by many of those that I address. (2004: 149)

While Gallman (2009) and Morelli (2011) asked their participants to draw themselves, following a more experience-led route in which the researcher was not intended to be involved in the physical production of the drawings, Ramos and the anthropologist Ana Isabel Afonso worked from a different angle: While participants told their stories and Afonso interviewed them, Ramos openly took notes – in form of drawings. These graphic notes, which visualised the stories of the people were then discussed with the participants and refined, extended and redrawn by Ramos on the basis of the given feedback. The first step of narrating and note taking thereby developed into a mutual collaboration, in which the informants were closely involved in controlling the recorded narrative and a representation of their stories, which were visually accessible for them. Michael Atkins, whose project was cited at the beginning of this article, followed a similar route to Afonso’s and Ramos’s: During his fieldwork in The Village he made drawings as he observed and often discussed them with his informants, asking them for their feedback.

Ethics: Does graphic mean anonymous?

Anonymity and the protection of the informant being among the key discourses and reasons for concern in anthropology, and this question was especially important for Atkins, whose informants were particularly vulnerable. The need to protect their anonymity excluded the possibility of photographing them in action right from the start of his research. Drawing them in a graphically transformed body was his answer to this challenge. Nonetheless Atkins, who is also a professional photographer, did not give up photography completely for his PhD project: for the comic, he took pictures of empty settings, which he then brought to life with his drawings of the people and the stories he had encountered.

We can find the idea of graphic representations as a format and tool for guarding the anonymity of informants and protecting their person in the introduction to Bartoszka, Leseth and Ponomarew’s ethnographic comic study about the students’ perception of public space, information, accessibility, technology and diversity at Oslo University College (2010).

[…] we believe that the comic book format with its convincing visual style and its preservation of anonymity (i.e. informants do not have to reveal their identity on screen or in photos, thus preserving their identities) may be a great solution. (Bartoszka et al, 2010: 8)

However, Bartoszka et al emphasise that the transformation of the informant into a graphic character cannot be the complete solution for an ethically sustainable ethnography. They point out that a level of fictionalisation (within the limits of the blurry terrain of faithfulness and trustworthiness) is just as necessary to protect not only the appearance of the informant, but also his or her story.

Just as written ethnography, we have manipulated some situations so as to anonymize the informants. […] Our goal was to tell a trustworthy story and, thus, present a trustworthy scientific result. (Bartoszka et al, 2010: 8)

Michael Atkins found similar concerns urgent to his study. Thinking about the possible future use of his drawn material and his observations for educational purposes (leaflets, posters, books etc.) Atkins has now decided to merge different stories and to communicate his ethnographic experiences in the field to the reader in what is to a certain extent a fictionalised form.

Representation

Drawing on the example of the presentation of the Holocaust in Maus, Galman (2009: 201) promotes comics as form of representation, which can, in contrast to prose-only texts, take account of multiple and even contradictory viewpoints on events. Released from the linearity of a flowing text, and from the duty of challenging and breaking up this linear form through the content – one of the big tasks for recent ethnographies – comics ethnographies are freed from the restrictions of soloist scripts to represent orchestral pieces. And at this point I would like to argue that it would make sense to take Comics Anthropology further than classifying it as a subsection of Visual Anthropology. Anthropology should instead acknowledge the tendencies turning towards the material in comics’ scholarship (cf. Comics Forum 2011) and explore the physical resources of the formats of comics (cf. the research of Mel Gibson, Ian Hague and Ernesto Priego) both for the representation of anthropological knowledge and for the animation, bringing-to-life, of ethnographically experienced worlds. This is of particular interest as anthropology becomes more and more intrigued by studying the cultural and social dimensions of the senses and is therefore in need of adequate ways to address these issues in terms of their formal (re)presentation.

What I experienced and what came up in the discussion about Michael Atkins’ work in the postgraduate seminar was the accessibility of The Village, or to be more precise, the accessibility of Atkins’ experience and interpretation of a fragmental dimension of it. As a reader I was caught in the atmosphere of a world the researcher and artist had powerfully animated according to his observations, but at the same time I felt ready to draw back and read the piece of work with a Brechtian distancing effect at any moment. The possible concern about the directness and boldness of comics for the purpose of presenting ethnographic results turned out to be in favour of an academic need for possible distance from the findings of a research and the argument of the author.

This accessibility and the seeming directness of the work could become a painful, but also very necessary opening process for the anthropological researcher and a major challenge for the impact of anthropological research: Ideas and consideration, encoded in long prose texts, are often only perceived in academic circles, far away from the place where the research project had been conducted and written in a language inaccessible for informants. In the format of comics ethnographies could reach these groups of informants. Instead of excluding informants from academic discourses about their own culture and way of living, anthropology could benefit from their critical readership.

The authenticity of ethnographic fiction

I would like to make a last point that came to my mind when reading Bartoszka’s and Atkins’ comic. I was wondering about the level of trust towards comics ethnographies. This particularly caught my interest after I had read the words ‘trustworthy’, ‘truthful’ and ‘faithful’ many times in the texts discussed earlier in this article. Galman even entitles her article “The truthful messenger”. Why was there this continuous affirmation of trustworthiness that even evoked my suspicion?

To give an answer I would like to take into account Teri Silvio’s theoretical proposition (2010), which he presents in his article ‘Animation: the New Performance’. Silvio there argues for the evolution from a world imitation, supported through the media of film and television, to an increasing world making, through the rise of the creative sector and growing amount of newly developed fictional and virtual spaces. His reflection on the duality of performance and animation, different but inseparable nonetheless, can light the way to understanding the concerns about trustworthiness of comics ethnographies.

The authors of comics ethnographies locate themselves mostly in the field of Visual Anthropology, a domain dominated by film and photography so far. As Silvio argues, both film and photography present an imitation of the world, while ethnographic films, which use little stylisation and conscious acting often try to be closer to reality and as a consequence claim to be more authentic. Whereas the authenticity desired in ethnographic films is an emic authenticity, focused on the imitation of the ethnographic field, coming from within it, comics ethnographies can and should develop a stronger etic authenticity.

What I mean by this is that comics ethnography searches for authenticity mainly in the mimetic performance of the data. Certainly this aspect of authenticity also plays an important role in comics ethnographies. However, authenticity can also come from a different direction: it can come from the author, whose perceptions are laid open through the drawings and the argument and his way of perceiving becomes very clear. He consciously animates his research topic with the fragments of the world that he, a responsible ethnographer, wants to show. The authenticity of comics ethnography lies in the fact that the author and artist cannot hide behind a camera and behind his data, but that he is openly in charge of choosing what fragments of his fieldwork he animates and how to address the reader, to represent the voices of his informants.

The comic anthropologists’ fear of not being trustworthy or of having to explain oneself results therefore from a monolithic search for authenticity at only one end of the scale. If anthropologists want to feel comfortable with presenting their findings as comics, we need a paradigm shift: We need to understand that the ethnographic use of comics cannot only be understood in relation to films, but also and maybe even more in relation to animations. In the animation, the emphasis is put on the responsible and skilled researcher-artist, rather than on the ‘reality’ of the data.

Bibliography

Afonso, A. I. and M. J. Ramos (2004). ‘New graphics for old stories. Representation of local memories through drawings.’ Working images: visual research and representation in ethnography. S. Pink, L. Kürti, and A. I. Afonso. Routledge London. 5: 72-90.

Bartoszko, A., A. B. Leseth and M. Ponomarew (2010). Public Space, Information, Accessibility, Technology and Diversity at Oslo University College. Oslo.

Gallman, S. (2009). ‘The truthful messenger: visual methods and representation in qualitative research in education.’ Qualitative Research 9 (2): 197-217.

Ramos, M. J. (2004). ‘Drawing the lines. The limitations of intercultural ekphrasis.’ Working images: visual research and representation in ethnography. S. Pink, L. Kürti, and A. I. Afonso. Routledge London. 9: 147-156.

Silvio T. (2010). ‘Animation: the new performance?’ Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 20(2): 422-438.

Hannah Wadle is a social anthropologist, journalist and philanthropic taking regular baths in human everyday and tourism culture in different parts of Europe. She graduated with a Masters in History and European Ethnology from Freiburg University (Germany), started her PhD at the Centre for Tourism and Cultural Change (Leeds Met.) about the socio-cultural impacts of post-socialist tourism on a small village in Northeast Poland and is continuing it now at Manchester University. Her interests in the medium of comics are comics as a new language for ethnography and comics and Socialism.

 

Comics Forum 2011 Audio

Audio files from Comics Forum 2011 are now available for download in MP3 format.

Graphic Medicine: Visualizing the Stigma of Illness

Ian Williams’ introduction to Graphic Medicine: Visualizing the Stigma of Illness is available for direct download as an MP3 here (07:26, 6.9MB (right click and ‘Save target as…’)). Online streaming and alternative download formats are available here.

Sarah Leavitt’s talk ‘Documenting a Family’s Struggles with Alzheimer’s Disease: Using Comics to Break Through Stigma and Silence’ is available here (35:08, 32.2MB).Online streaming and alternative download formats are available here.

New talks will be added to the Comics Forum 2011 conference archive as they are released, and you can also subscribe to the Graphic Medicine podcast to receive all episodes of the series directly through iTunes here.

Materiality and Virtuality: A Conference on Comics

The second keynote session from Materiality and Virtuality: A Conference on Comics is available for direct download as an MP3 here (01:10:48, 64.9MB). Online streaming and alternative download formats are available here.

This talk featurs keynote speakers Tim Dant, Matthew Sheret and Tom Humberstone, and is introduced by Ian Hague. There are also contributions from Daniel Merlin Goodbrey, Dominic McNeil, Padmini Ray Murray, Hannah Wadle and others.

There is some background noise and music on this file due to the location of the recording, however, the speakers remain audible throughout.

The manifesto entitled ‘Declaration of The New Vague’, which was included in the first issue of Solipsistic Pop and is discussed by the speakers is available to read online here.

IH

 

Comics Forum 2011: Full Programme

The full text of the Comics Forum 2011 programme is now available for download from the Comics Forum 2011 archive.

You can download it directly here.

This version of the booklet has been updated since the printed version that was given out at the conference. It includes an abstract and biography for Aneurin Wright, who stepped in to give a paper at the last minute, a biography for replacement chair Simon Grennan, and some other minor corrections and updates. Hyperlinks have also been incorporated.

Comics Forum 2011 has been discussed by Ian Williams, Katie Green, Andrew Godfrey and John G. Swogger. If you wrote on the event and would like your post to be linked to in our archive, get in touch at comicsforum@hotmail.co.uk and let us know!

IH

Comics Forum 2011 was supported by Thought Bubble, the University of Chichester, the Henry Moore Institute, Dr Mel Gibson, Routledge, Arts Council England, Intellect and Molakoe Graphic Design.

 

Comics Forum 2011

Running across three days, featuring over fifty speakers and hosting more than one hundred and ten delegates overall, Comics Forum 2011 was our biggest event yet. Barring a few minor technical hitches things ran smoothly, and we enjoyed a wide range of very high-quality papers from speakers from around the world. We also saw some wonderful keynote presentations and discussions from Daryll Cunningham, Posy Simmonds, Tim Dant, Matthew Sheret and Tom Humberstone. A big thank you to everyone who came along and helped to make the event a success!

The 2011 page of the website has now been moved into the Comics Forum archive. The full text of the conference programme will be available to download from there shortly, and we also hope to be able to feature downloadable conference papers (subject to authors’ permissions). Watch this space for updates.

Comics Forum is now on Twitter, and the 2011 conference was live-tweeted by our very own Hattie Kennedy. You can follow Comics Forum at @ComicsForum to stay up to date with all the latest developments.

Comics Forum 2012 is in the works…

IH

Comics Forum 2011 was supported by Thought Bubble, the University of Chichester, the Henry Moore Institute, Dr Mel Gibson, Routledge, Arts Council England, Intellect and Molakoe Graphic Design.

 

Comics Forum 2011 Preview by Kirstie Gregory, Ian Williams and Ian Hague

16/11: Sculpture and Comic Art (Kirstie Gregory)

The Henry Moore Institute is a world-recognised centre for the study of sculpture in the heart of Leeds. An award-winning exhibitions venue, research centre, library and sculpture archive, the Institute hosts a year-round programme of exhibitions, conferences and lectures, as well as developing research and publications, to expand the understanding and scholarship of historical and contemporary sculpture. The Institute is a part of The Henry Moore Foundation, which was set up by Moore in 1977 to encourage appreciation of the visual arts, especially sculpture. We are open seven days a week from 10am-5.30pm, with the galleries and library open until 9pm on Wednesdays. The library opens at 1pm on Sundays.

We are very pleased to be joining forces with Comics Forum for an event which considers comics and sculpture together from new perspectives.

Following a welcome to the three-day event from Comics Forum Director Ian Hague, Head of Sculpture Studies at the Institute, Lisa Le Feuvre, will give a brief introduction to the work of the Henry Moore Institute. Before the first session Kirstie Gregory will give a brief introduction to various themes of the day including experimental figuration, issues of narrative and space and the differences and dialogues between two-dimensional and three-dimensional art.

The first session will be chaired by artist and Academic Leader of Art at Leeds Metropolitan University, Chris Bloor, and the papers will look at historical interrelationships between sculpture and comic art. Richard Reynolds, from the School of Graphic Design at Central Saint Martins presents ‘The Superhero Genre and Sculptural Form – From Antiquity to Now’, in which he will look at the superhero genre as a key conduit for the reinvention of many themes of heroic sculpture (and painting) that have become disassociated from the discourse of contemporary fine art. This will be followed by Florence Quideau of Rutgers University, New Jersey, who in her paper, ‘The Visual Power of Sculpted Caricatures and Comic Lithographs’ will argue that sculpted caricatures and comic lithographs have an indelible visual power, also addressing the reversed practice of making two-dimensional drawings from three-dimensional caricatural statuettes, a method which emerged in Paris in the 1830s. Artist Ian Kirkpatrick will end the first session with ‘From Classics to Comics: Hero, Myth and Narrative in Contemporary Sculpture’ in which he will discuss his own practice in the context of comic art icons. He will propose that when enacted within contemporary artistic practice, comic icons fulfill similar roles to the ancient Greek and Christian heroes of classical painting and sculpture, offering familiar archetypes as touchstones for the examination of present-day concerns — while the structural innovations of comic art offer novel ways to convincingly depict narrative, character, scene and conflict.

After the lunch break author and curator Paul Gravett will chair a session concentrating on monuments, monumentality and multiples. Tim Martin of De Montfort University will in his paper, ‘Smithson Entropy and the New Comedy’ look at the humour of Smithson’s essays and his comedy of matter, his shared jokes with other artists and his aggressive jokes aimed at art critics. Martin will demonstrate the anxiety that drove the artist’s wit. Following this Nottingham Trent University’s Stuart Burch will present ‘Statue of Judgement: Estonia’s Bronze Soldier from a Dreddful Perspective’, which will compare fictional events in Judge Dredd with remarkably similar disturbances which occurred in the Estonian capital, Tallinn in 2007. Events in Tallinn formed the basis of Kristina Norman’s installation work After-War, Estonia’s contribution to the 2009 Venice Biennale. Burch will explore the migration of ideas between sculpture and comics art through these examples.

The final session in the day will be chaired by the Henry Moore Institute’s Research Curator, Jon Wood and will look at the expanded space of comics. Curator and artist Kim Pace was the originator of the national touring exhibition ‘Cult Fiction (Art and Comics)’ in 2007 in which the work of fine artists and comic artists was carefully juxtaposed. In her paper ‘The Beginnings of Comic Language in Spatial Terms’ she proposes to extend the relationship between the language of comics – and its trajectory from Roman inscribed columns through satirical prints, drawings and newspaper comic strips – to include commedia dell’arte, the circus and sideshows, carnival and vaudeville, and will relate this to the beginnings of comic language in spatial terms. Dan Smith, from Chelsea College of Art and Design will present ‘Space and Excavation in the Work of Olivia Plender’. Smith will suggest that the use of comics is part of a strategy that incorporates the sequential visual narrative as a corollary to the sculptural, object based spatial elements of gallery practice, as part of the same ongoing practice of excavation and reconfiguration. The spatial play of comics in relation to the sculptural is an as yet underexplored aspect of this practice. Finally, Catherine Labio of the University of Colorado will look at ‘Comics’ Third Dimension’, underscoring the three-dimensionality of comics and arguing for the need to study comics in relation to architecture and sculpture (and vice versa).

Artists Paul McDevitt and Cornelius Quabeck will be making art which responds to the themes of the day throughout the conference.

The conference will be followed by a wine reception in the Henry Moore Institute, next door to Leeds Art Gallery from 5.30-7pm.

17/11: Graphic Medicine: Visualizing The Stigma of Illness (Ian Williams)

We are very excited to be holding the third international conference on comics and medicine as part of the Thought Bubble Comics Forum and are very grateful to the Comics Forum director, Ian Hague, for inviting us to take part.

Many medical schools have encouraged the reading of classic and contemporary literature to gain insight into the human condition, a move generally seen as corrective to this century’s overvaluing of medical science and technology, that attempts to bridge the gap between knowing about a disease and understanding the patient’s experience of that disease. (Squire 1998, p.128). As an alternative form of literature, and as an important visual presentation of the body and its social relationships, the medium of comics is attracting attention from healthcare scholars, clinicians and service users. An expanding body of academic literature on the subject and the enthusiastic reception for the subject at two recent international conferences held in London and Chicago signals the excitement that examination of the medium brings.

The theme for this conference is Stigma, which has a number of meanings when applied to medicine: it can refer to a sign, mark, feature, indicator of something, which generally has a negative connotation; a moral or physical blemish; a distinguishing personal trait that is perceived as or actually is physically, socially, or psychologically disadvantageous; or any physical mark or peculiarity that aids in identification or diagnosis of a condition. With its history of radical narrative and innovative representation, comics seems well placed to examine the phenomenon, and we have a diverse line up of speakers who will approach the subject from various angles.

We had a strong response to our call for papers, and to fit in as many papers as possible we will be running two parallel sessions. After few opening words from yours truly, Session 1A, chaired by my co-organiser, Maria Vaccarella of King’s College, London, will cover Stigma and Cognition. The two speakers are Sarah Leavitt, author of Tangles, who has come from Vancouver to speak and Lucía Miranda-Morla who is coming from Paris. Session 1B, chaired by MK Czerweic, aka ‘Comic Nurse’ who has contributed excellent posts on this blog and who headed the organisation of our recent Chicago conference, will cover Stigma and Disability. The speakers are Jean-Francois Ferraille and Shelley Cuthbertson. After a half hour break for refreshments, Session 2A, chaired by me, will be the first of two panels that cover Stigma and Autobiography, with speakers Andrew Godfrey and Katie Green. Panel 2B is entitled Stigma and Community and will be chaired by Fiorenzo Iuliano Postdoctoral Research Fellow in American Studies at the University of Naples “L’Orientale”. The speakers are Simon Moreton and Pushkar Aggarawal.

There will be an hour for lunch. In order to keep the delegate fee as low as possible, we decided not to provide lunch as part of the programme, but the Art Gallery is very close to many eateries and food outlets.

We will start again at 2pm with Session 3A, entitled Stigma and Society, chaired by John Swogger, illustrator of There’s Something Different About Dad which will feature Karrie Fransman and Fiorenzo Iuliano. Session 3B is the second of our Stigma and Autobiography panels and features Nicola Streeten and the comics artist known as ‘Brick’ with Theodore Stickley. The chair will be Mita Mahato, Assistant Professor of English at the University of Puget Sound, Washington State.

A quick break for more coffee and tea precedes our final parallel sessions- 4A, Stigma and the Reactive Body features papers by Mita Mahato, Sarah McNicol with Simon Weaver and Paula Knight. The session will be chaired by Nicola Streeten, author of the recently published Billy, Me & You. Session 4B chaired by Maria Vacarella, examines Stigma and Caregiving with papers by Muna Al-Jawad, MK Czerweic and Linda Raphael.

The day will conclude with a keynote address by Darryl Cunningham, acclaimed comics artist and author of Psychiatric Tales. Darryl has two more books due for publication shortly: Science Tales and Uncle Bob Adventures.

Speakers will have travelled from the US, Canada, Europe and various parts of the UK. We have a good number of delegates booked, who come from diverse backgrounds including healthcare, social work, medical illustration, comics art, publishing and various strands of academia. Part of the value of this conference will found in conversations initiated between delegates, the exchange of ideas and the meeting of future collaborators. Please make the most of your day, we aim for an inclusive experience. Do not be afraid to ask questions, introduce yourself to others or seek help from the organisers. We hope you enjoy it.

Reference:

Squire, H.A. (1998) Teaching humanities in the undergraduate medical curriculum. In: Greenhalgh and Hurwitz Narrative Based Medicine: 128-140.

18/11: Materiality and Virtuality: A Conference on Comics (Ian Hague)

In the third day of Comics Forum we move on to consider some of the most pressing issues facing comics as an art form and an industry, in the present day. Taking as our organising themes ‘materiality’ and ‘virtuality’, we will be looking at the nature of comics as a printed medium and the ways in which digital forms are affecting the field.

We begin with two parallel panels. Session 1A looks at printing and publication, with papers from Mel Gibson, who will be considering the publication formats of British girls’ comics and the ways in which they impact perceptions of class; and Matt Green, who will be looking at the way in which visionary materialism has been manifested in works from William Blake to Alan Moore. Session 1B will look at readerships and communities, with Anna Madill talking about the material forms taken by Japanese manga when it is experienced in translation, and Sina Shamsavari looking at the ways in which “gay ghetto” comics work to construct notions of a “typical” gayness.

Following a short refreshment break, we resume with another set of parallel panels. Panel 2A looks at digital comics. Materiality scholar and co-founder of the Comics Grid Ernesto Priego will begin proceedings with a consideration of the importance of guidelines for the citation of comic art in the digital age; an important subject for the development of scholarship. Daniel Merlin Goodbrey will look at the various ways in which digital comics might develop to take advantage of new technologies, considering the possibilities of new forms such as locative, sonic, game, spatial and augmented reality comics. Dan Berry wraps up the panel with a paper that considers the shift from analogue to digital media and asks whether the move to digital is one that divests the print medium of its sensory qualities. Meanwhile, panel 2B will be looking at the intersections between comics and other media. Nicolas Pillai kicks us off here with a paper on truth and transmediality in the X-Files comics, followed by William Grady, who will speak on the complex historical interrelationships between comics and dime novels, focusing on the Preacher comic book series and the novels that narrated the life of Buffalo Bill Cody. Finally, James Peacock will discuss Jonathan Lethem’s use of concrete metaphor in Omega the Unknown.

After lunch, our final parallel panels look at comics and philosophy and storytellers and storytelling. In panel 3A, John Holbo opens with a discussion of accretion and the crisis of the easel painting, considering the possibility that after the easel comes the panel and the page, and, perhaps, the post-page. Aaron Meskin follows this up with a discussion of the possibilities of site-specific comics and the ways in which such comics might function. In panel 3B, Alberto Cipriani and Mauro Marchesi will present their work on a Hong Kong tower block, in which they transformed the whole building into a comic. They’ll be followed by Christine Kuhn, who will consider the potential comics have to explore the space between the rational perception of the self and the narration of the irrational, sharing her work with a team of media specialists in bringing interactive graphic stories to the web.

After a short break we will hear from the first of our keynote speakers, Posy Simmonds. Posy is the author of such works as Tamara Drewe and Gemma Bovery and her works have appeared in such publications as The Times, Black Dwarf, Woman’s Own, Sun, Observer and Cosmopolitan. Her talk will be illustrated with a number of her wonderful images.

We wrap up the sessions at the art gallery with a meeting intended to examine comics scholarship’s current position in the academic sphere and determine where we might go from here. The day concludes with an evening keynote session at the Carriageworks Theatre, just off Millennium Square. This discussion session will feature Professor Tim Dant, a reader in sociology at Lancaster University, Tom Humberstone, editor of Solipsistic Pop and Matthew Sheret, editor of Paper Science. The discussion will cover a wide range of topics, from the material qualities of printed comics to the shift towards digital forms.

The day promises to be a lively one, with talks on a diverse range of subjects. As Ian said, we are really aiming for Comics Forum to be an inclusive and engaging event that brings together scholars and creators in a mutually enriching dialogue. All are welcome.

We look forward to seeing you there!

Kirstie Gregory is Research Programme Assistant at the Henry Moore Institute. She studied at the Courtauld Institute, London, and the University of Queensland, Australia.

Ian Williams runs the website GraphicMedicine.org and also draws comics under the pseudonym Thom Ferrier, publishing strips online and in print.  He has trained in both medicine and fine art and has written for both medical and comics journals. His Medical Humanities MA dissertation was on medical narrative in comics and graphic novels.

Ian Hague is a PhD student and associate lecturer in the History department at the University of Chichester. His research focuses on how comics engage all of the reader’s senses to communicate information and meaning. He did his BA in English at the University of Hull, and his MA in Cultural Studies at the University of Leeds. His research interests include materiality, technology, and theoretical approaches to comics.

Comics Forum 2011 is supported by Thought Bubble, the University of Chichester, the Henry Moore Institute, Dr Mel Gibson, Routledge, Arts Council England, Intellect and Molakoe Graphic Design.

 

Comics Forum 2011 Poster

The Comics Forum 2011 poster, put together by Ben Gaskell of Molakoe Design, is out today. As always Ben’s done a great job and we’re very grateful for all his hard work! Click here for a larger PDF version, and feel free to circulate this to any interested parties; all welcome.

IH

Comics Forum 2011 is supported by Thought Bubble, the University of Chichester, the Henry Moore Institute, Dr Mel Gibson, Routledge, Arts Council England, Intellect and Molakoe Graphic Design.

 

Comics Forum 2011: Keynote Speakers and Programme

I’m pleased to announce five wonderful keynote speakers for Comics Forum 2011.

Appearing as part of Graphic Medicine: Visualizing the Stigma of Illness on day 2 (the 17th of November), we have Darryl Cunningham, author of Psychiatric Tales and the forthcoming Science Tales.

At Materiality and Virtuality: A Conference on Comics on day 3 (the 18th), we’ll be hearing from Posy Simmonds, author of Gemma Bovery and Tamara Drewe. Our evening keynote discussion will bring together Professor Tim Dant, head of sociology at Lancaster University and author of Materiality and Society and Material Culture in the Social World: Values, Activities, Lifestyles, Matthew Sheret, editor of Paper Science and Tom Humberstone, editor of Solipsistic Pop.

The programme is now available here.

Comics Forum 2011 is scheduled for the 16th to the 18th of November 2011, and will take place at Leeds Art Gallery. It will comprise three events:

16/11/2011 – Sculpture and Comic Art

17/11/2011 – Graphic Medicine: Visualizing the Stigma of Illness

18/11/2011 – Materiality and Virtuality: A Conference on Comics

The registration form is available here.

Tickets are priced as follows:

1 day ticket: £10

3 day ticket: £30

5 day ticket: £40 (includes two-day pass to Thought Bubble convention)

Comics Forum 2011 is supported by Thought Bubble, the University of Chichester, the Henry Moore Institute, Dr Mel Gibson, Routledge, Arts Council England, Intellect and Molakoe Graphic Design.

 
 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 163 other followers

%d bloggers like this: